GTK+: a multi-platform toolkit for creating GUIs
Source link: https://www.gtk.org/
The LWN.net Weekly Edition for June 22, 2017 is available.
Source link: https://lwn.net/Articles/725471/rss
06/20 OpenMandriva 3.02
Source link: http://distrowatch.com/openmandriva
GNOME’s Mutter 3.25.3 window manager / compositor is now available as the newest release in the path towards GNOME 3.26…
Source link: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GNOME-Mutter-3.25.3
Millions of people are Amazon Prime subscribers, but many of them don’t realize that in addition to free shipping and Prime Instant Video, they also get unlimited photo storage for all their computers and mobile devices.
Red Hat and community developers took their own sweet time, but the next version of Fedora is finally on the runway and ready to fly.
Source link: http://www.zdnet.com/article/fedora-26-beta-finally-rolls-out/#ftag=RSSbaffb68
If the federal government wants to compel an online service provider, like Yahoo or Google, to turn over your email, they need a warrant. That’s the industry-accepted best practice, implemented by nearly every major service provider. More importantly, it’s what the Fourth Amendment requires.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the federal agency charged with enforcing federal securities laws, seems to think it falls outside the warrant requirement. In a civil case currently pending in Maryland, the agency asked a federal judge to compel Yahoo to comply with an administrative subpoena—read, not a warrant—it sent to the company, which would require the company to turn over the emails of one of its users. An administrative subpoena lacks the privacy safeguards of a warrant, including a higher standard justifying government access (i.e., probable cause) and prior review by a judge.
Yahoo fought back, refusing to comply with the subpoena and opposing the SEC’s motion. Last week, EFF, joined by our friends at CDT, filed an amicus brief in support of Yahoo. Our brief made a simple point: if the federal government wants to compel a third-party provider to turn over a user’s email, it needs a warrant. That rule applies to the SEC, just as any other federal or state government agency.
The SEC’s position isn’t a new one. They have long claimed a right to access email content from providers without a warrant. In fact, the SEC has been one of the primary obstacles to passing an update to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), the federal law that governs government access to emails and other content stored in the cloud. But this is the first time (as far as we know) that the SEC has tested its theory in court.
Fortunately, even though the SEC has so far been successful in blocking attempts to amend ECPA, the agency still has to contend with the Constitution. As we explained in our brief, because users have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their email stored with online service providers (a point SEC wisely conceded), the Fourth Amendment requires the agency to obtain a warrant—or to rely on an exception to the warrant requirement—in order to intrude upon that privacy.
The SEC argues that, as a civil law enforcement agency, it lacks the power to obtain a warrant by itself. But as we pointed out, whenever there is a criminal component to an investigation—as is the case here—the SEC can coordinate with the Justice Department to obtain a warrant. Apparently, the SEC is concerned that, in purely civil cases, when it can’t work with the Justice Department to obtain a warrant, companies or individuals may be able to shield their emails from disclosure. But civil litigation offers a variety of levers for the SEC to pull in order to obtain the same or similar information, without compelling its disclosure from a third-party service provider.
Ultimately, our constitutional privacy rights shouldn’t be diminished just because the SEC wants to conduct its investigations more efficiently. The hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday, June 30. We hope the court will send a clear message to government agencies: if you want to compel a third-party provider to turn over email content, get a warrant.
Sometimes, while working on the command line, you arrive at a point where there’s too much text on the terminal screen, and none of that is relevant to you. So, in order to avoid distraction, you’d want to clear the terminal screen. Those new to the Linux command line may not know that there exists a dedicated command line utility that does this work for you.
Source link: https://www.howtoforge.com/linux-clear-command/
Rhythmbox Alternative Toolbar is a Rhythmbox plugin that improves the look and layout of the music player by rearranging elements and using CSD.
This post, Make Rhythmbox Look Better with this Alternative Toolbar Plugin, was written by Joey Sneddon and first appeared on OMG! Ubuntu!.
Nico Gulden has announced the release of Univention Corporate Server (UCS) 4.2-1, a new build of the Debian-based server distribution featuring a web-based management system for central administration of servers: “We are pleased to announce the availability of UCS 4.2-1 for download, the first point release of Univention….
Source link: http://distrowatch.com/9869